Friday, June 10, 2011

愛玉裡的化學!


夏日炎炎,又到了冰冷品的旺季。無奈這個夏天遇上了塑化劑風波,大部分的飲料都受到波及,因此筆者的母親今天特別跑去傳統市場買來了愛玉子,準備來做愛玉凍消消暑。

下午洗愛玉時,筆者突然對愛玉凍的性質感到好奇,為什麼愛玉凍放置久了之後會變成一鍋水?又為什麼將假愛玉(以洋菜為原料)加熱後會溶化,但真愛玉卻不會呢?

在網路上查了查資料後,才發現好吃的愛玉可是大有學問!

愛玉凍之所以會凝結是因為愛玉子含有果膠。在我們洗完愛玉後,有種叫做果膠酯酶(pectinesterase)的酵素會和有高含量(高於7w%)甲氧基(-OCH3)的果膠作用,果膠酯酶會將果膠脫去部分的甲氧基,使其成為低甲氧基含量的果膠。低甲氧基含量的果膠接著會和水中的鈣離子及鎂離子起交聯反應(cross-link)而成為凝膠。高甲氧基的果膠則須要和糖類才能產生交聯反應,因此果膠酯酶可說是愛玉成凍的關鍵!

一般市售的愛玉現在皆使用洋菜中的紅藻膠(carrageenan)替代愛玉的果膠,紅藻膠屬熱可逆性凝膠,遇熱會溶化;而果膠則是熱不可逆凝膠,加熱後還是不會改變結構,因此不會溶化(當然,加溫到極高溫還是會溶化的)。

至於愛玉凍製成一段時間後,凍中之水份逐漸析出的情形,我們稱之為離水現象。愛玉中有另一種酵素叫做聚半乳糖醛酸酶(polygalacturonase),聚半乳糖醛酸酶會將果膠中的半乳糖醛基水解,因此果膠的結構就被"吃"掉啦!凝膠的狀態也就無法維持了。

延伸閱讀:
蔡仲華:《愛玉子專題報告》於《中央研究院高中生命科學資優生培育計畫專題研究報告》
李柏宏(民89):愛玉子凝膠性質及愛玉凍品質之研究
石正中(民76):愛玉凍離水現象之研究

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Simply Science Series

Scientific American已經很久沒更新影片了,正苦於不知道要翻什麼的時候,正好在網路上找到Nature Education的Simply Science系列,正好就是我想推廣的類型!

因此,我會努力趕上進度的!(目前已出到第31集)

----
蒙娜麗莎的微笑 Simply Science Episode 1: The Mona Lisa's Smile
b
l
a
n
k

蒙娜麗莎的微笑 Simply Science Episode 1: The Mona Lisa's Smile

Script: (No guarantee of accuracy.)

Adam Weiss (W): Welcome to Simply Science from Nature Education. I’m Adam Weiss and I’m here at Harvard Medical School in Boston with Doctor Margaret Livingstone who looks how people see and looks how artists actually understand how people see. Sometimes, as well as, you guys do that, right? We are going to talk about the Mona Lisa, as an example of how artists can, they do experiments how we see.
Dr. Livingstone (L): Absolutely! So, the Mona Lisa is a very famous painting, very popular painting. And the art historians tell us it’s popular because her smile is ambiguous. You can’t tell she’s happy or said. But, if you look at the Mona Lisa, and, I want you to try looking between her eyes and mouth. So first, look at her eyes, but think about what her mouth looks like. Now, it’s kind of hard to know where your eyes are going. But try it to look at her eyes and think about how much she’s smiling.
W: So, I’m staring her right the eyes at the moment (L: Yes!) and try to think about her mouth.
L: And then look directly at her mouth.
W: It’s ambiguous.
L: Yeah, now look at her eyes again. Go back and forth and see if her expression changes.
W: It looks like she’s smiling when I look at her eyes and she’s just sitting there when I look her mouth.
L: So now, that’s not true imagination, that’s not like the art historian said. That has something to do with the way you see, not the way you think.
W: So that’s my eyes and my brain doing that to me, not my imagination.
L: It’s your eyes.
W: Really?
L: Yeah, because your vision, because the way you recognize and organize. It’s much higher acuity in your central gaze, so if you look at that central dot, all the letters in the image are equally readable. So you can see that there’s a dramatic fall off in acuity away from your central gaze.
W: Yeah, if I look at one of the big letters, I can’t see small ones at all.
L: And, so that’s why you move eyes when you read. Because the letters are tiny in the book and you could only see them in your central gaze. So, that doesn’t mean your peripheral vision is bad. It just means that your peripheral vision is designed to see bigger, blurrier things and your central vision is for looking at tiny, detailed things. But this difference in acuity with eccentricity is probably why Mona Lisa’s expression changes as you look at it. Because if you filter the Mona Lisa, in such a way that you can see what she would look at if you saw the whole thing with your peripheral vision compared to what she would look like if you saw the whole thing with your central vision which you of course can’t do. You can see that her expressions are quite different.
W: So, here we got on the left, the overall blurred version that you’ll get if you’re just in the sight of your eyes.
L: Peripheral vision, yeah.
W: And, the other side is the sharpened, just details part.
L: Yap, exactly.
W: And she’s definitely smiling while the not the other.
L: Yeah.
W: So, that’s amazing.
L: so, as you move your eyes around, her expression changes because you go from your peripheral vision to central vision in different part of image. And that gives the dynamic quality to a steady image which before the days of the video was very special thing be able to do.
W: So did and she was about this.
L: I don’t know if we aren’t all actually understood this phenomenon. Because he wrote a lot of techniques to use. He was actually a scientist. He wrote about a lot of techniques about shading and how your two eyes work and things like that, but he never wrote about this particular phenomenon. And we know that he liked this painting because he worked on it for years and then he carried it around with him for a long time till he gave it to the king of France. So he may had experienced the same thing and maybe he didn’t understand exactly what was going on.
W: Well, these are computer technology and the understanding the brain that we have these days. We can figure out but maybe he didn't know certainly very well.
L: Yes, it’s the understanding of eyes and our brain. This happens very early in the visual system, this difference between central and peripheral vision. It happens in record.
W: Uh, so, this is how we see demonstrated by da Vinci.
Great, thank you very much.
L: Sure.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

3D摹擬星系成長 A Galactic Growth Spurt

http://www.scientificamerican.com/video.cfm?id=913760431001
這段3D影片模擬了一百億年前銀河系可能的模樣。
銀河系正處於快速成長的階段,紅色線條代表著又冷又厚重的空氣;冷空氣往星系盤中沉降。同時,新生的恆星從星系的核心中誕生,並催動高熱的氣流(藍色線條,溫度高於一百萬度)。

Script: (No guarantee of accuracy.)

This 3D simulation shows a galaxy similar to Milky Way might be look 10 billion years ago. The young galaxy is experiencing a turbulent growth spurt. Cold, dense gas showed in red collapse in a heap of the galactic disk. Meanwhile, new stars are formed from the core of galaxy, driving a hot stream of gas showed in blue at temperature more than one million degrees. The interplay process makes a complex and dynamic environment.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

突吻蝣蛇抓魚的詭譎技巧 Tentacled Snake Uses Sneaky Strategy to Catch Fish

Script: (No guarantee of accuracy.)
Tentacled snake, name for the two appendages perched on the tip of its nose, is a master of ambush. But this snake has caught something other than fish lately. It’s caught the eyes of scientists.
Its markable strategy for catching prey has become a subject to study.
In the wild, the snake lives in the rivers in Southeast Asia.
It camouflages itself by holding a pose that resembles a dead tree branch. As an unsuspecting fish swims nearby, the snake swings into action and swallow it whole.
It happened so quickly that it is impossible to capture with regular film. But when view at 2000 frames per second, about a hundred times the speed of standard film. The snake’s strategy becomes clear.
It uses a quick flick of its body to start on the fish, corralling it toward its head and into its mouth. The snake exploits reflex that normally helps fish it captures. Two large nerves on either sides of the body called Mauthner Neuron react pressure ways and involuntarily cause the fish to move in the opposite direction.
Most of the time, this mechanism works in the fishes’ favor. But the Tentacled snake creates false waves, causing the fish to the wrong direction and straight into its waiting jaws.
What about those unusual tentacles that give the snake its name? Those are actually highly-involved motion detectors perfectly tuned to the movement of fish. They let the snake detect food even in murky, silty water, its natural environment. They are features that strike fear and sometimes fangs into heart of fish everywhere.
To learn more about the Tentacled snake, read the article “Natural-Born Killer” in the April issue of Scientific American.